Yup. Justice Thomas says the same thing this morning..
This is from a SCOTUS blog article:
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the denial of the stay, in a three-page opinion that was joined by Justice Antonin Scalia. Thomas argued that, [w]hen courts declare state laws unconstitutional and enjoin state officials from enforcing them, the Courts ordinary practice is to suspend those injunctions from taking effect pending appellate review. Noting that the Court had granted a stay in similar circumstances a little over a year ago, Thomas suggested that Alabamas request should have been treated no differently. Moreover, Thomas observed, the Courts failure to grant a stay may well be seen as a signal of the Courts intended resolution of the same-sex marriage question. This, he complained, is not the proper way to discharge our Article III responsibilities. And, it is indecorous for this Court to pretend that it is.
Thanks for that very important information.