Well then you were wrong.
You do seem to show up in these forums to offer contrary opinions a lot......
That's right. I'm a conservative in all senses of the word - which means I don't approve of anarchy. When a court issues a ruling I disagree with, I express my disapproval and then I obey it. Some of the talk on this thread is radical in the worst sense. This is either a country of laws or it's a country of the mob.
Be careful what you ask for. Just ask the Russians - the Left can out mob-rule us any day of the week.
@ Alter...”This is either a country of laws or it’s a country of the mob”
What are you talking about? We already ARE under “mob” rule, via the Obama administration. They are the “mob”, and they just make up the law as they go.
Resorting to a mob action or violence could be very dangerous, indeed.
But resistance of some sort is needed because the onslaught isn’t stopping with legalization of gay marriage.
We already know that because people have lost their jobs and will lose their jobs just for having the opinion that gay marriage is wrong and supporting traditional values....
Businesses will be harassed for reflecting their faith in their business.
That’s flat out not American and silence is not an option.
Live and Let Live is a good policy and I believe in its 360 degree application.
Religious people sometimes get too angry and want to fight when they need to be accepting of LGBT people, but the LGBT crowd cannot try to hurt religious people and business like they are with people like Brendan Eich losing his job as CEO of Mozilla.
See, that is the difference right there, between law abiding conservatives and libs. Conservatives do as you suggest.
Libs will piss and moan, and go hell bent for leather forming committees, movements, entire fields of protesters, eventually finding that lone, obscure judge somewhere to overturn the previous ruling, the one, in many cases, previously decided by majority voting at the ballot, or another court.