Gee, Chaz, maybe it’s the example you set, that being Anglican and British means you should renounce your culture and SUBMIT to the religious practices of others in public:
![](http://i60.tinypic.com/ehy6x4.jpg")
![](http://i59.tinypic.com/2irqddi.jpg"width=960)
![](http://i57.tinypic.com/2wd1zjt.jpg"width=960)
![](http://i58.tinypic.com/2edqlgj.jpg")
![](http://i62.tinypic.com/123tvkj.jpg")
![](http://i57.tinypic.com/2e210n5.jpg")
![](http://i62.tinypic.com/28us3uo.jpg"width=90)
![](http://i57.tinypic.com/1grkaf.jpg")
Or maybe it’s because of what you said, making moral equivalence of all religions, knowing (as you should have) that one of those religions seeks total world dominance by cultural incursion, immigration, violence, enslavement and rape (hint: it wasn’t the Christian one):
Christian, Muslim, Sikh and Jewish: multi-faith coronation for Charles
2006: The proposed changes follow comments already made by Prince Charles, who has said that he wants to be "Defender of Faith" – not "Defender of the Faith" – when he succeeds to the throne...