Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: barmag25

Well, since the crusades were a ‘reconquista’ (kicking out the invaders and all that), I’m sure the liberals won’t mind if there is a repeat.


4 posted on 02/06/2015 9:40:30 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Liberals are for indigenous peoples unless they are white.


12 posted on 02/06/2015 9:49:21 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe

I agree. The article is correct, in the sense that saying a glass is half empty is as correct as saying it is half full.

The Crusades were a Medieval response to Islamic savagery and aggression. To the extent that there are still savage and aggressive Islamists,”Islamophobia” is motivated by the same causes as the Crusades.

In fact, if the Islamists keep it up, I’m afraid there may soon come a time when the public begins to demand a new Crusade.


36 posted on 02/07/2015 8:24:37 AM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson