Never mind that vaccines are impure and contain Hg, Al, formaldehyde,SV40 virus.
Obama has come out in favor of taking vaccines.
That should tell you all you need to know.
I’m not opposed to vaccination as long as the vaccine has been shown to be effective and does not contain impurities.
Why is this so controversial? No one wants to take impure and unsafe medications and food.
[ Never mind that vaccines are impure and contain Hg, Al, formaldehyde,SV40 virus.
Obama has come out in favor of taking vaccines.
That should tell you all you need to know.
I’m not opposed to vaccination as long as the vaccine has been shown to be effective and does not contain impurities.
Why is this so controversial? No one wants to take impure and unsafe medications and food. ]
Be Careful, The Boot Licking Freeper Brigade is gonna call you an AXE CRAZY LOONATIC...
What I find funny is people who have vaccinated their kids whining about how their kids may catch X diseas from an unvaccinated kid, even though they already vaccinated kid against X disease.
Shouldn’t their kid be just fine because they have been vaccinated against disease X?
That is unless they are afraid that vaccines don’t work, but wouldn’ that make them anti-vaccine?????
A lot of vaccines are shown to be “effective”, but they never claim to prevent anything. What effective means (in the parlance of this discussion) is that the body’s response to the vaccine causes antibodies to form. Effective doesn’t mean it prevents the disease being vaccinated against - it just means the body should create the correct antibodies (they think) to fend off the disease.
There are a few people among the population in the most recent outbreak in FL that had the MMR vaccination prior to getting sick with the Measles from said outbreak.
Measles is rarely if ever fatal and it is treatable with cod liver oil (high concentration of vitamin A) among other easily acquired items. A 0.015% or lower fatality rate and a vaccination that does not confer protection will never convince any reasonable person that they should rush to get stuck in the arm to placate the fears of some hair-brained mediot that calls them epithets.
Precisely.
Ok, we have a elite mini minority who has openly declared their desire--no, not only desire but intent--on ridding the world of most of us. We have had a Merck vaccine developer who has admitted vaccines routinely contain hidden cancer viruses derived from diseased monkeys. Would their be a more effective vehicle to insure a vast chunk of us don't make it much beyond our productive years than a vaccine or a series of vaccines who each trigger another needed component to cause disease? Or, say, a component in a vaccine that is later triggered by something in the environment?
Google "Transcript of audio interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman"