It is against FR rules to change the title of a posted article.
I did not change the title of the article. The title of the article is as posted and at the linked article.
I gave the posting a different title because my title is more descriptive. The title of the post as it has now been edited, is deceptive because the Washington Post is the author. The title states "This Rand Paul interview with CNBC didn't go well".
The interview did not go well because the interviewer is a belligerent liberal media hack who has a personal agenda, and Rand Paul, like him or not, beat her at her incredulous slanted reporting game.
To title the article in a neutral manner as did the WaPo, is to place the journalist on equal footing as Rand Paul, when she is supposedly just a unbiased reporter. Hardly the case.
If the title of the article is propaganda, must it be repeated? Must that be the unintended function of Free Republic?