I see. Lied by omitting data which was suspect. Which really is suspect: if the numbers in that data from the Georgia study played out in the general population then it would be incredibly easy to verify - there would be a much larger percentage of black males with autism. Please show me anything that demonstrates that. Or even localized to Georgia.
The data wasn’t suspect.
You do realize why they left out that particular data?
Yes?
It wasn’t just this one paper, either:
“I have a boss who’s asking me to lie...Higher ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it. In terms of command, I was 4 out of 5.”
“...the effect [autism] is where you would think it would happen. It is with the kids without other conditions [”isolated autism”]...I’m just looking at this and I’m like ‘Oh my God....I cannot believe we did what we did...but we did [bury the data on these children]...It’s all there...It’s all there. I have handwritten notes.’”
Lots of info on this here too:
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1164794