Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tellw
US Supreme Court justices do not need to be lawyers. However, Solicitors General are required to be “learned in the law.”

That's just what former Chief Justice Rhenquist told an interviewer,except he also followed up with, "whatever that means."

125 posted on 02/03/2015 5:25:03 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

“Learned in the law” could possibly mean they read “Writing a Will for Dummies.”! But I think hy wrote it that way so that solicitors general (like lawyers in general) do not always need to go to law schools to be admitted to the bar. Virginia and California allow people to become lawyers by simply “reading the law” as part of an apprenticeship (this is how Abraham Lincoln became a lawyer). There have been a handful of USSC justices who became lawyers through the the “reading” method.


137 posted on 02/04/2015 6:33:45 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson