Posted on 02/01/2015 7:13:57 AM PST by rktman
After Sarah Cherrys father was robbed at gunpoint two months ago at an Arkansas Dominos pizza store, the former Army military police officer began carrying a gun with her for protection to her job at the same restaurant.
Cherry had cause to use that gun a .380 Wednesday night when three armed men wearing hoodies stormed into the Blytheville eatery and shot at her during a robbery attempt.
When she came around [to the front of the store], she didnt know what was going on, Cherrys father, Clint Cherry, told The Daily Caller during a phone interview. She came around front, and she shot.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
She shot to scare. She should of have shot to kill.
Guess whose families would have ended up owning that franchise. :>}
Too bad she didn't shot to kill...robberies probably would have done down dramatically...
No. Nof an armed robbers family.
I don’t take killing lightly....
BUT, you don’t shoot at armed assailants to “scare them”!!
Those armed assailants WILL KILL OTHER INNOCENT VICTIMS!!!
In before the “She needs more time at the range!” posts.
I don’t believe she shot to scare, having been an Army MP. I believe she missed but after the fact said otherwise to keep her job.
Lowlife losers aren’t in style anymore...
In contrast to the robber punks, who just know how to shove a gun in their pants
I wish they would publish a description of the “perps,” then we could help locate them.
correcto...
Probably needs a bigger gun too. LoL
Dominoes franchise owners can set their own policies.
I don’t think she will be fired.
The pizza industry’s corporate anti-gun policies run afoul of the Second Amendment.
While a private business has every right to keep employees from carrying guns into the workplace, no private business has the right to prevent their employees from defending their lives and that of their customers.
I do NOT patronize pizza shops that PROHIBIT any of their employees from being armed while at work. Simply call a shop and ask them. If they do prohibit, I tell them that I will not do business with them. Period.
Simple. Black males. No other option. Had they been White, the press would have had that in the banner headline. Above the fold, 40 pt type.
The second amendment applies to federal or state governments and does not apply to private businesses or individuals. As a home owner I can prevent any one from entering my home with a weapon except law enforcement agencies having pproper autority.
No No you can’t say that. It has to have been “teens”, or “youths”. ;)
It seems to me that franchises in high crime areas, but under the onus of bad corporate gun policies, could make a deal with each other that if one of their employees used a gun to defend himself, so the corporation fires them, that they get a “lateral promotion” to another franchise at the same or better level.
This would be good for them, good for their employees, and good for business.
It would be appropriate it for the franchise owner to give her a raise and publicly present her with some sort of award in front of TV and Newspaper cameras. That would likely prevent the use of a gun in that store for a while.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.