Skip to comments.
REPORT: AL JAZEERA’S BANNED ‘ISLAMIST,’ ‘JIHAD,’ ‘TERRORIST’ FROM AIRWAVES
Breitbart News Network ^
| 29 Jan 2015
| by JORDAN SCHACHTEL
Posted on 01/29/2015 10:27:48 PM PST by garjog
Al Jazeeras New York and Washington, D.C. journalists have reportedly received strict orders from Qatari management: please do not use the words terrorist, militant, Islamist, jihad and extremist in your reporting.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; pcspeec; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Sounds like Al Jazeera got the same memo sent to Obama.
Look. There must be a money trail from Qatar to Obama interests.
1
posted on
01/29/2015 10:27:49 PM PST
by
garjog
To: garjog
2
posted on
01/29/2015 10:29:28 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: garjog
So they’re following along behind CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC... About time they joined the ‘mainstream.’
Will they then refer to them as ‘lone wolf workplace incidents’? Or have they not gone that far off the edge yet?
3
posted on
01/29/2015 10:43:22 PM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: garjog
Agitated yoots lashing out against Islamaphobic injustices.
4
posted on
01/29/2015 10:51:02 PM PST
by
sagar
To: garjog
They have joined team Obama?
5
posted on
01/29/2015 10:55:03 PM PST
by
jospehm20
To: garjog
“REPORT: AL JAZEERAS BANNED ISLAMIST, JIHAD, TERRORIST FROM AIRWAVES”
Now, can we also ban actual islamists, jihad and terrorists from the US?
6
posted on
01/29/2015 11:56:31 PM PST
by
aquila48
To: garjog
I guess it offends their what, 10 viewers? I wonder how long until manbearpig offers to buy it back for a quarter of what he sold it for?
7
posted on
01/30/2015 12:22:01 AM PST
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
8
posted on
01/30/2015 2:15:54 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: garjog
Al Jazeeras New York and Washington, D.C. journalists have reportedly received strict orders from Qatari management: please do not use the words terrorist, militant, Islamist, jihad and extremist in your reporting.Is it true that countries that contain no Muslims also have no problems with murder and mayhem by Muslim terrorists, militants, Islamists, or extremists practicing jihad? Those countries do not use those words.
9
posted on
01/30/2015 2:50:02 AM PST
by
olezip
(Time obliterates the fictions of opinion and confirms the decisions of nature. ~ Cicero)
To: Gene Eric
Now if we could ban them from existence, all would be well.
Islam, just another civil rights movement?
10
posted on
01/30/2015 2:51:12 AM PST
by
urbanpovertylawcenter
(the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
To: garjog
They are to be referred to as “well meaning young scamps”.
11
posted on
01/30/2015 4:27:25 AM PST
by
Russ
(Repeal the '17th amendment)
To: garjog
12
posted on
01/30/2015 4:47:27 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: garjog
So they cannot use the Words terrorist, militant, Islamist, jihad and extremist and instead will simply refer to Muslims and Islam when reporting terrorist jihadis?
13
posted on
01/30/2015 5:35:44 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: aquila48
No kidding...what about “orcs”?
To: garjog
Use words like ‘loveable’, ‘smart’, ‘Christian and Jewish loving’ when you describe Muslim Terrorists - Al Jazeera
15
posted on
01/30/2015 5:45:59 AM PST
by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: garjog; GeronL; Nachum
Do they use the terms “radical right” “right wing extremists” and “global climate change deniers”?
16
posted on
01/30/2015 5:56:38 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: aquila48
They might as well ban the term “moderate muslim” since they see them all as one big ball of wax.
17
posted on
01/30/2015 5:57:33 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: garjog
But I thought there was nothing wrong with the word “Jihad”. I thought it just meant “struggle”? Why would they ban such an innocuous word? /s
18
posted on
01/30/2015 6:48:33 AM PST
by
Personal Responsibility
(Changing the name of a thing doesn't change the thing. A liberal or a rose by any other name...)
To: Secret Agent Man
19
posted on
01/30/2015 7:13:18 AM PST
by
odds
To: odds
That’s huge if true. All we need now is alphabet news to ban communists from airwaves.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson