Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The A-10's Last Fight?
AmericanThinker.com ^ | January 29, 2015 | Richard Pecore

Posted on 01/29/2015 7:15:03 AM PST by Reverend Saltine

I am...a fan of the A-10 Warthog. I believe in the mission, and I believe that there is no other weapons platform out there that can do the job the A-10 does, with the same efficiency, effectiveness, and confidence that it provides to our troops on the ground. It’s big, ugly, and slow. It’s also rugged, durable, and extremely deadly. The Air Force likes new toys. Other than the venerable B-52, the A-10 is the oldest plane in the inventory. The F-35 was not built solely for the specific mission of ground support as was the A-10. The F-35 is the new F-16, or so goes the argument. It can do many things well, not just one. But the price tag is enormous. This is one time, I believe, that the USAF has it wrong. I am usually in favor of new technology. Battlefield innovation is a bad thing to lag behind in, but some innovations like the old F-111 never lived up to the hype. Is the F-35 an effective weapons system? It still might be, but it is not a “low cost” version of the F-22, and the jury is still out. The original idea was to match up the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II and repeat the success of the F-15 Eagle and F-16 Falcon. Then they tried to add the flexibility of the F-4, and it all went to hell. After over a decade of development and prototypes, cost estimates per unit have ranged from over $98 million...to $178 million for a standard A model to $337 million for the Navy version. The bottom line is that the cost per copy has risen exponentially higher than planned, and there simply will not be as many airplanes as originally planned. That changes the argument.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: a10; aerospace; pentagon; waronmilitary; warthog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: SandRat

That is, if Obama doesn’t close DM. Since the day he took office, Obama has terrorized Arizona any way he could.


41 posted on 01/29/2015 8:09:36 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: immadashell
If I understand it correctly, the F-35 won't even have an operational gun for several years. How can that be an effective ground support aircraft?

Because people who made a career of flying the go-fasts and now have stars on their shoulders say so. Therefore, those of us paying the bills should just STFU...

42 posted on 01/29/2015 8:11:22 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

The 22 has been “retired” a couple of times but they didn’t quit manage to get it to the airpark in the desert. It will fly until the 35 proves it is at least half as good, maybe for many years yet.


43 posted on 01/29/2015 8:12:28 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

Hell, they gonna make an F-35 variation to replace the KC-134 and may be the Abrams, too.


44 posted on 01/29/2015 8:14:39 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
Because people who made a career of flying the go-fasts and now have stars on their shoulders say so. Therefore, those of us paying the bills should just STFU...

Their understanding of "mission" has been overshadowed by their impending post-retirement "careers" with the aerospace manufacturers.

45 posted on 01/29/2015 8:18:48 AM PST by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: al_c

“Tough aircraft too! Those things can take a beating and still fly.”

They were designed to fly with 40% of their air surface gone. They also have redundant controls, hydraulics, cables, push rods.


46 posted on 01/29/2015 8:19:27 AM PST by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The F-35 is like the Crusaders replacing their steel plate and chain mail with leather and trading their lances for billy clubs before assaulting the saracens.


47 posted on 01/29/2015 8:20:50 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Moslem victory over the Infidel is always the goal.


48 posted on 01/29/2015 8:23:08 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Damn, you’re right!

The things this tool can do !
Rus and Susie Phillips
Extremely useful tool, I’ve used it on almost every trip I have been on.
Indiana Jones
Ended up stabbing the cat when i was just trying to burn him.
Colby P.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1,384 of 1,421 people found the following review helpful
Surprising Results
By a fan on December 31, 2013
I tried to file my nails, but in the process I accidentally fixed a small engine that was near by. Which was nice
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
501 of 524 people found the following review helpful
Ooops
By Owenlong on May 27, 2014
I forgot the knife in the front pocket of my Swiss Army shorts and when my wife washed them it completely disassembled our washing machine.
Comment Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
3,739 of 3,957 people found the following review helpful
Found this...
By MechYeti on January 22, 2011
...stuck into a stone while on vacation. I’m impressed with it, generally. Unfortunately, it turns out that removing it made me the new king of Switzerland, which is a lot of responsibility.
43 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
1,567 of 1,693 people found the following review helpful
Bad Tooth Pick Placement
By MozartFX on October 27, 2010
It’s a great knife, it’s just that the toothpick is in the center of the knife so when you use it, it looks like your playing some kinda f’d up harmonica.
13 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
486 of 525 people found the following review helpful
Disappointing
By Cwin on March 16, 2014
This would be a great product but was dismayed to find it has no banana slicer- that’s a deal breaker. Returning today.
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
642 of 701 people found the following review helpful
Changed my life
By Amazon Customer on May 27, 2014
Received this knife as a gift for my 18th birthday. Wish I’d have known what it was because as soon as I touched it, I grew a mustache and became a Navy Seal. Mom fainted and my dad laughed and handed me a beer. I was born a girl.

Minus 2 stars because my breasts were really nice.
7 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
208 of 227 people found the following review helpful
It doesn’t have a TOWEL!
By Kevin Moore on May 27, 2014
But it doesn’t have a TOWEL! It does, however, come equipped with a Babel fish for those long Vogon flights.
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
121 of 131 people found the following review helpful
87 to 88!
By CurtisH on May 27, 2014
Doc Brown and I added a flux capacitor and charged this bad boy with 1.21 gigawatts of power and it flat disappeared.
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
See all 525 customer reviews (newest first)
Write a customer review


49 posted on 01/29/2015 8:24:57 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

My history instructor at OCS flew A-10’s and F-117’s. He wouldn’t stop talking about the A-10’s.


50 posted on 01/29/2015 8:27:31 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

Yes sparky. The argument does indeed apply to the 22 as well. But it doesn’t get people excited like it does on the 35 because the 22 is a capable fighter plane on its own with basically F-15 performance.
The F-35 is a different concept, “forget performance and hope stealth does it all”. Very different from the F-22. (all 187 of them, production line closed and tooling destroyed)


51 posted on 01/29/2015 8:31:41 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

The EOTS system? You are bragging that the F-35 has the EOTS? LOL!
Older jets currently in service with the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps can carry the latest generation of sensor pods, which are far more advanced than the EOTS sensor carried by the F-35. The latest generation pods—the Lockheed Martin Sniper ATP-SE and Northrop Grumman LITENING-SE—display far clearer high-definition video imagery in both in the infrared and optical spectrum—and from greater distances. Further, both pods have the ability to beam those full-motion video feeds to ground troops, which provides those forces with vital intelligence information.

Both pods also incorporate the ability to mark targets with an infrared laser beam—which the EOTS lacks—that helps pilots and ground controllers coordinate their attacks.

But the F-35 moonpig is stuck with mid 90s tech because of this two decade gestation period.

Im happy that you can earn your living doing something, somewhere with the 35, but just be grateful for the work. Don’t try to convince us that the 35 is anything buy a giant step backwards.


52 posted on 01/29/2015 8:37:28 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
So true. And among the other controversial opinions in the article:

The U.S. military, with the exceptions of the Sherman Tank and F-16, has almost always chosen quality over quantity.

The original decision to procure the F-16 was as a "low cost fighter" supplement to the F-15 fleet. However that has been overshadowed by 40 years of reality.

In practice, the F-16 has been an outstanding performer far exceeding the original design expectation. It has performed so well it's systems were used to define the avionics and flight control systems baseline requirements of the next generation of fighters, the F-22 and F-35.

The author was also a little harsh regarding the F-111. The TFX concept was ugly and the F-35 is doing nothing to dispel the perception. Robert Strange McNamara masterminded the bad idea, one among his many. However as the 'Vark matured it was the one manned bomber system the soviets feared. They tried to negotiate it's demise during arms limitation talks.

53 posted on 01/29/2015 8:45:12 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TYVets
An excellent idea, but the A-10 is not carrier compatible.
54 posted on 01/29/2015 8:54:48 AM PST by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

The KF-35. Able to refuel any other aircraft up to 400 gallons! Ha!


55 posted on 01/29/2015 8:59:16 AM PST by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Very true ref the 111. As a tactical bomber and as a strategic bomber it excelled and freaked out the world for a while. And the Soviets built their own copy, but it wasn’t as nearly good.

And back to the F-35. Despite its very weak power to weight ratio, astonishingly it has a higher wingloading than an F-104! This thing is dead if it ever has to fight one inch outside of its narrow tech performance envelope. IE,,the real world.


56 posted on 01/29/2015 9:00:20 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: al_c

I grew up next to the Middle River, MD Air National Guard base. Watching them fly was excitng and delivered a sense of pride now lost. On a quiet day where my Grandparents lived you could hear the sounds of the practice raids comming off the Upper Chesapeake all the way in Back River.


57 posted on 01/29/2015 9:02:42 AM PST by AmericanRobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

It will be done. They are developing an aerodynamic fuel tank that can be towed by 4 KF-35s.


58 posted on 01/29/2015 9:13:22 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

the GF-35 Abrams variant will have rudimentary wings, tracks, and a 55 millimeter cannon in a turret mounted behind the cockpit.


59 posted on 01/29/2015 9:15:06 AM PST by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

Just give them to the Corps. Otherwise they will be just parked in the desert. I would say they should be sold to Israel cheap but our HMIC hates them and wants them gone - God will win that one.


60 posted on 01/29/2015 9:31:45 AM PST by mcshot (OMG We're going down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson