Yes, that is correct. I should have been more specific since it is the EMPLORER mandate that would be eliminated (in the 36 “federal exchange” states) along with the subsidies if the SC rules for the plaintiffs.
And most (but likely not all) individual penalties would be eliminated in those states.
Thanks for the link. There are 2 employer mandates. The first is the over 50 FTE rule. That one is the $2K penalty per employee for not offering insurance. The second is the $3K penalty if an employee gets a better deal on the exchange. No exchange, no penalty. I think the first example would remain in effect.