[DiogenesLamp]

No, it's a number cited by the people charged with combating drug addiction. And it puts lie to your claim.

No it doesn't, despite your assertions to the contrary. Your two data point extrapolation with one number made up is childish. That you expect it to be accepted and "prove" something is even more childish.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Ad hominems are childish (is that redundant)

[Ken H]

No, it's a number cited by the people charged with combating drug addiction. And it puts lie to your claim.

No it doesn't, despite your assertions to the contrary.

Yes it does.

Your two data point extrapolation with one number made up is childish.

Those 2 numbers come from your heroic Drug Warriors.

That you expect it to be accepted and "prove" something is even more childish.

It demonstrates that the numbers from the people running the WOD say you are FOS.