Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Why did Coke have the “coke” removed?

http://wings.buffalo.edu/aru/preprohibition.htm


103 posted on 01/28/2015 12:49:33 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: SZonian
addiction was low and declining in post-Civil War America: "In 1880 [...] there were over 400,000 opium addicts in the U.S. [...] By 1900, about one American in 200 was either a cocaine or opium addict." (http://web.archive.org/web/20110529221013/http://www.justice.gov/dea/demand/speakout/06so.htm) 400,000 in a population of 50M is one in 125 - ergo, between 1880 and 1900 addiction declined.

Why did Coke have the “coke” removed?

Not because of any epidemic of cocaine addiction (whatever nanny-staters of the day may have claimed).

110 posted on 01/28/2015 1:02:01 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson