Yes, you misinterpreted my statement.
Badly.
I was contrasting what the Vatican II vision was for the laity with what Romulus has deemed was sufficient. They are not the same thing. This was in reply to a question that Romulus had raised about my knowledge of Vatican II.
Then you proceeded to attribute acts of liberalism to me. (Kumbaya...seriously?)
Uncalled for.
OK, I got it wrong. But explain, if you will, this business of sitting in pews. What did you mean by that?