Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upsdriver; CyberAnt
Yes, but not for president. In this interview with Hannity she says the nominee needs a track record to go along with the rhetoric. Cruz doesn't have a track record yet.

B.S.!

What rock have you been hiding under?

As a Senator, his last three years have shown a track record that no other Senator can match.

You have a purposefully distorted definition of "track record" designed to favor your candidate who is a governor.

Scott Walker has NO Foreign Policy experience, while Ted Cruz, on the other hand, has a ton of it, always Leading the conservative charge on EVERY foreign policy issue.

Scott Walker has stated next to nothing on border issues, EXCEPT being for an open border and Amnesty, Ted Cruz, on the other hand, has been fighting to secure the border and stop the Executive Amnesty of Obama.

On every single national issue, Ted Cruz is out front and center, occasionally we hear something from Scott Walker.
48 posted on 01/28/2015 6:29:02 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

I’m not for Scott Walker. I support Sarah Palin, who I believe is going to enter the race. I like Ted Cruz and want him to remain in the Senate where he can assist the agenda for the next administration. As far as accomplishments go, Cruz really hasn’t had any successes yet. He has no track record whatsoever in terms of administration. He is a very intelligent individual but those administrative skills of getting results have yet to be proven. Both Palin and Walker have demonstrated real results. IMO, choosing a president from a pool of senators is not the best option.


52 posted on 01/28/2015 6:55:06 AM PST by upsdriver (Palin/West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I do agree partly .. but now that Walker has decided he’s going to make a run for the WH (possibly), his comments may change.

And .. prior to this, Walker was so busy with all the attacks upon Wisconsin, maybe he wasn’t as focused as Cruz on border and foreign policy issues. That’s not to excuse Walker .. but just to realize Walker had his hands full, and Cruz was in the Senate where he had access to all the border and foreign policy issues.

I’m still concerned about Walker leaving Wisconsin. I’m very confident the UNIONS are salivating over the possibility of him leaving the state .. which might leave the state wide open to be destroyed by said unions. I don’t have any stats on how strong the state govt is or if there is a viable person of Walker’s stature who could run (and win) for the Gov’s office.

And .. I would like to see Walker go out and help other Governors recover their states too.


73 posted on 01/28/2015 12:52:18 PM PST by CyberAnt ("The hope and changey stuff did not work, even a smidgen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson