Posted on 01/26/2015 11:27:50 AM PST by jazusamo
Excomunicate the Witch!!!
BTTT
Yeah well the exalted Catholic Church FAILS to do a damned thing about these abortion supporters.
It does not matter where Pelosi lives, or who is “her” archbishop. Cardinal Wuerl in Washington has consistently lied about this point, pretending that politicians from other parts of the country are not his concern.
What matters is where she receives Communion.
Any priest who gives Nancy Pelosi Communion commits a mortal sin. Any bishop of a place where priests give Pelosi Communion also commits mortal sin.
Cardinal Burke laid it all out for his brother bishops almost ten years ago:
Right. It is the duty of Catholic clergy to DENY COMMUNION to people like Pelosi.
This is an obligation. Those who refuse to fulfill this obligation commit MORTAL SIN.
Pelosi said in an interview that she decides things for herself based on her own understanding after considering what the Catholic Church says, what the Bible says, and how she feels after praying about something. The basic foundation for her is Self and Self Alone which is the real basis of all Protestant and Protestant derived "Christianity".
They've already rendered their mind and soul to Caesar in order to gain power so what they claim to believe is irrelevant, really. For them, the highest possible authority is Self, that's it, that's all.
Statements like Cordileone’s always sound as if Pelosi just REVEALED, TODAY that she is pro-abortion.
Every archbishop of SF for the last thirty years has made a statement about having a “conversation” with Pelosi about abortion. IIRC, it was revealed recently that NO SUCH CONVERSATION has ever taken place—with any archbishop of SF.
Cordileone has to have known for 40 or 30 years that Pelosi is pro-abortion.
Sent December 6, 2014.
The Most Reverend Blase J. Cupich
Archbishop of Chicago
PO Box 1979
Chicago, IL 60690-1979
Your Excellency:
I have viewed the video and read the transcript of your recent interview with Norah O’Donnell.
You declared that the reception of Communion is “a time of forgiveness of sins.” Since the specific sin at issue was the promotion of abortion, your statement implies that the reception of Communion forgives the sin of promoting abortion.
But this is impossible, since the reception of Communion forgives only venial sins.
It could not have been your intention to imply that promotion of abortion is only venially sinful.
Thus, it is your duty to make another public statement, clarifying both that: The promotion of abortion is mortally sinful; the reception of Communion does not forgive mortal sins.
Moreover, far from forgiving mortal sins, the reception of Communion in the state of mortal sin is the mortal sin of sacrilege. You did not mention this in the interview.
The other major assertion in your interview was that you reject the Church’s discipline of denying Communion to notorious grave sinners.
As Cardinal Burke established beyond a shadow of a doubt in his now-famous article on the subject, giving Communion to notorious sinners is always grave matter. It is always a source of grave scandal because it is a public sacrilegious act, and because it constitutes public approval of the notorious sin in question. http://tinyurl.com/canon915
Thus, giving Communion to a pro-abortion politician is to give public approval of his promotion of abortion, and, necessarily, abortion itself.
Canon 915 merely codifies this moral norm. The act prohibited by Canon 915 is always grave matter. You pledged to commit this act.
Having been reminded that giving Communion to persons who are obstinately persisting in manifest grave sin is itself a mortal sin, you are obliged to repudiate the pledge you made to Norah O’Donnell to commit that mortal sin.
Other bishops have made the same public pledge. And they have punished priests who refused to commit the same mortal sin.
Because no bishop has the authority to mandate that any minister of Communion commit this mortal sin—
4. Bearing in mind the nature of the above-cited norm (cfr. n. 1), no ecclesiastical authority may dispense the minister of Holy Communion from this obligation in any case, nor may he emanate directives that contradict it. Http://tinyurl.com/pont915
—the priests of the Archdiocese of Chicago have the right to be reassured immediately that there is no possibility that you would punish a priest for obeying Canon 915. Indeed, it is your duty to remind them of their strict, grave obligation to obey it.
I am sure I need not elaborate on the extreme urgency of correcting the situation of a Catholic bishop’s pledging in public to commit mortal sin.
Catholic FReepers were heralding Cordileone for having a backbone when he was first announced.
We all have our views on abortion? Um, this is a pro-life forum. Your position, as you have stated it so clearly abive, is not one if life. Explain how someone conceived in rape has any lesser value as a human being?
I will pray the scales fall from your eyes. You’re advocating an evil. Becaus you fail to see the truth. And when it comes to abortion, the is only one truth. It’s either a human being or it isn’t.
So, no we don’t all have our views on abortion.
Pro-abortion catholics politicians have excommunicated themselves when they support abortion. The good bishops like this one will refuse to give her communion and publically call for her to repent. The democrat operative bishops like Cupich, Dolan and Donna Wuerl will continue to commit mortal sin by allowing these baby killers up for communion.
These two ladies conceived in rape but saved from the abortionist knife should demand to address the Republican National Committee when they finally get around to selecting someone to run against Hillary Clinton. The GOP official platform for years has claimed they are “pro-life” but believe it’s perfectly fine to abort children conceived in rape and incest.
Common sense isn’t it, I absolutely will let you know that some people get so over the top scorched earth on the matter that they can’t be reasoned with.
If it was my justice, I would cut the balls off the rapist if it was a guy, and the guy was found guilty by trial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.