Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
IIRC, both of those "justices" are in fact homosexuals themselves.

So, if true, that should be enough to recuse them. They have no business ruling on an issue they have a personal stake in. That is the point of recusal, even to an idiot like me.

2 posted on 01/24/2015 7:57:55 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: doorgunner69
Ah, my mistake, thought the recuse question was about Sotomajor and Kagan.

Doubt if Buzzy is a lesbo, or even thought about sex for many decades.

8 posted on 01/24/2015 8:50:23 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: doorgunner69

Ginsberg has been married for quite a few years. She’s just extremely liberal. Of course, if the argument is that gay marriage would devalue or harm heterosexual marriage, then one could make the case that she should recuse herself because she has a heterosexual marriage...


10 posted on 01/25/2015 5:15:02 AM PST by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson