Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew

The pro-life movement should have focused on state nullification of Roe v. Wade from the beginning, because Roe, Doe, et al., were commands directed at the states.

Instead, the movement wasted 42 years, and counting, agitating for a Constitutional amendment. There’s nothing wrong with the Constitution in that regard.

The pro-life movement has also done virturally nothing to promote removing abortion from the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, or a Congressional finding that the unborn baby is a person within the meaning of the 14th amendment.

In hindsight, we realize something that few could imagine in 1973: Most Catholic bishops have been pro-abortion, with Bernardin as their leader. Their god is the Democrat party.

Today, all the “leading” bishops are pro-abortion: Chaput, Cupich, Gomez, Wuerl, Dolan, O’Malley. All of them give Communion to pro-aborts, which signals clearly that they do not consider abortion to be sinful.


67 posted on 01/24/2015 6:31:56 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan
state nullification of Roe v. Wade

If we are to survive as a free nation under the Rule of Law of the Constitution, states must expand that to nullification of ALL unconstitutional federal acts. Woulda, shoulda, coulda don't get us there, nor does bitterness or regret over the past. What's done is done. The only thing that matters at this point is states begin the nullification process NOW.

72 posted on 01/25/2015 12:26:50 PM PST by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson