It’s these kind of questions that will force the left to see their flawed and twisted logic.
These so called anti discrimination laws obviously infringe on our Constitutional rights.
Too bad SCOTUS has wiffed on each opportunity to correct this.
No. It won’t. By their logic, one is hate speech and the other intolerance by the bakery.
We don’t need Human Rights Commissions. We’ve got the Bill of Rights and it allows Freedom of Association. That includes all kinds of discrimination.
Now, watch liberals demanding private property rights be returned to businesses. SCOTUS has backed businesses into a corner with their ridiculous belief that once you’re in commerce you lose your God-given rights.
Methinks ye have a bit more faith in the reasonableness of the beguiled Left than I.
There is nothing that can force them to see their flawed and twisted logic. They will find some “reason” (and I use that term loosely) why the situations are totally different and not comparable.
The answer to that one is in the story: They're already down to splitting hairs with a fury, looking for the Clintonism that will allow them to define, to make the rules about, what the meaning of "is" is.
They'll never give up. But we can beat them flat and scrape them down into the seams of the sidewalk by just blowing past their tergiversations and hammering the equation between this case (which the conservative perp obviously intended, and we should help him) and the stuck-on-stupid court cases pretending to punish people for refusing services to perverts pushing their "gay pride" propaganda with wedding cakes.