Not very compelling arguments.
Beaches and navigable waterways need to be accessible to the general public.
I disagree when courts generally find that owners must provide unimpeded access to the beach or waterway because that does cut through their property.
If you can’t find a property with those attributes (beach, waterway) where travelers and recreational users aren’t a nuisance, then you haven’t looked hard enough or you’re simply not wealthy enough.
That is a lovely piece of BS. The property in question has been continuously owned by the same family since 1641.
That doesn't give the madding crowd the 'right' to dump their trash and dirty diapers in what amounts to someone's front yard.
Navigable waterways? so navigate, already. Private beaches should be private. Exceptions have always been made in the event of an emergency.
Maybe those more mobile should select areas where they won't mess up private property (which isn't so mobile). The owners live there, the visitors don't have to be there. That simple.