Looks like we’re sliding down that slipper slope faster than we thought we would after opening the door to redefining marriage.
Correct. I defy anyone to explain how this is “wrong” in terms that could not be also applied to same-sex marriage.
The door was opened. All but the most far left Liberals have not idea what they have started...
Once sodomite “marriage” became the law of the land (and in my opinion, the SC will rule for it), the floodgates were opened. State-sanctioned “marriage” is a mockery, and I wish there was a way to disentangle tax law and financial benefits from it. The way it’s going, Christians may just have to bite the bullet and and forego the state benefits, and keep the sacrament of marriage in church before God, a pastor, and brothers in Christ as witnesses. I wonder if that’s feasible if Christians are willing to give up the state “carrots” to have their marriages sanctioned by the state? I wouldn’t want my marriage-between one man and one woman, before God and Christian witnesses-to be on a par with men “marrying” men, daughters “marrying” their fathers, people “marrying” their goats, etc.
Remember how the queers ridiculed those who maintained that allowing them to marry would eventually lead to incestuous persons marrying, or polygamy, or bestiality etc. etc??? SICK!!!!