Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37

Back story if anyone interested.

The Georgia Supreme Court has reinstated the death penalty for Andrew Howard Brannan, who was convicted of killing Laurens County deputy Kyle Dinkheller.

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Hugh Thompson, the high court reversed a Butts County judge’s ruling that threw out Brannan’s death sentence, although it is not clear whether that judge also vacated Brannan’s conviction.

The jury found Brannan guilty of murder, but after a later hearing the court threw out Brannan’s death sentence. Monday, the Georgia Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty for Brannan. “For the reasons set below, we reinstate Brannan’s death sentence and, to the extent that it is necessary to do so, we also reinstate his conviction,” Monday’s opinion says.

In January 1998, Dinkheller stopped Brannan on Interstate 16 after clocking him at 98 mph. A video-camera on the deputy’s car showed that Brannan got out of his truck, and Dinkheller demanded he take his hands from his pockets and approach him, but Brannan didn’t move. In the videotape shown to the jury, Brannan then began swearing, dancing in the street and yelling, “Shoot me.” He rushed the deputy, they scuffled and Brannan ran back to his truck while Dinkheller called for backup.

At one point, Brannan yelled he was a “Vietnam combat veteran.” After rummaging in his truck, despite Dinkheller’s commands to stop, Brannan pulled out a .30 M-1 carbine and opened fire, hitting Dinkheller nine times, including firing one last shot at close range. He was later found hiding in the woods and arrested.

At trial, his attorney claimed he was not guilty by reason of insanity and presented experts who testified he suffered from post traumatic stress disorder, which had triggered a flashback to Vietnam. However, the court-appointed psychiatrist concluded Brannan was sane, and the jury found him guilty of murder, rejecting his insanity defense.

In 2002, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld his conviction and death sentence. In 2003, Brannan filed a petition challenging the legality of his conviction and sentence in the county where he is imprisoned. After a hearing, the court threw out Brannan’s death sentence on the grounds that his trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to present certain mental health defenses in both the guilt-innocence and sentencing phases of his trial. The judge found that trial counsel was deficient for failing to emphasize Brannan’s history of bipolar disorder and depression, and produce evidence of the traumas Brannan had suffered in Vietnam.

But in today’s 23-page decision, the Supreme Court found that trial counsel did present expert witnesses and evidence of Brannan’s mental illness.


9 posted on 01/13/2015 12:44:37 PM PST by eastforker (Cruz for steam in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: eastforker

Thank you, I really appreciate the further details.

Personally, I can’t see a reason to excuse this man for those actions.

I’m not sure how much I support not guilty by reason of insanity pleas to be honest.

I might be able to support it in the case of a battered spouse or child abuse or something along these lines, but I can’t see something like that in the case.


23 posted on 01/13/2015 12:59:47 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: eastforker

This guy was bipolar and he was a forward observer?

“Soldiers in this MOS must meet a number of requirements not demanded of other military careers. The observer must be acutely aware of the position and movements of friendly troops as well as those of opposing forces. Because of the strategic importance of this information, observers in the Army must qualify for a security clearance; the [1] depends on the specific position. Observers must be able to work independently for long periods of time and, because the clandestine nature of their work and their frequent placement on or behind enemy lines, the ability to operate with minimal support is of great importance as some missions can often last for days or weeks.

Physical demands on forward observers are often extremely high since they fight alongside or in support of airborne infantry, light infantry, mechanized infantry, a joint task force or a sister service while carrying a much greater equipment load (radios, secure communication equipment, laser rangefinder and target designator, etc.) than the maneuver element they are attached to.”

Execution? Where is O.J.?


24 posted on 01/13/2015 1:02:14 PM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: eastforker

I’m 66 and a Vietnam vet. A travesty that it took nearly sixteen years to bring this creep to final justice.

Would like to see his DD 214 with all his combat awards.

I’ve been told how to go to the VA & give all the right answers to get disability payments for PTSD. No thanks.


32 posted on 01/13/2015 1:09:47 PM PST by elcid1970 ("I am a radicalized infidel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: eastforker

Was it ever affirmed that he was a Veteran? There are many people who claim to be a veteran but aren’t. Some even claim to be a combat veteran when about one in seven actually see combat but served in support units. I speak here of “ground pounders” - Army and Marines.


51 posted on 01/13/2015 1:50:16 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson