Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92
It was a screen door.

Nope. I've seen pictures. It was a solid door with 4 panes of glass in the upper portion with curtains over them. The shot went thru one of the panes and hit Vicki.

Even without curtains, seeing through glass into a darker building is at best problematic. Which is of course a good reason for not firing a shot into such a situation, particularly when there are children in there.

As stated, I have still seen nothing resembling evidence that Vicky was intentionally targeted.

Vicki was by my personal standards a nut. But she didn't deserve to be shot and killed, intentionally or accidentally.

"Accidentally" is of course not exactly the right word. The shot was fired on purpose. It just apparently hit something the shooter didn't intend to hit.

39 posted on 01/14/2015 3:17:48 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Its been a long time, but IIRC the shot was clear, the order was take out any adult, and she qualified, baby in her arms notwithstanding.


42 posted on 01/15/2015 8:10:01 PM PST by Apogee (Just when I thought I was All done with sleepless contemplation of jus ad bellum and jus in bello,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson