Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

“Immoral, unconstitutional legislation.”


Not this [crap] again.

By all means, let’s keep abortion legal until the 38th week of gestation. Surely it’s better to make those 20-38 babies martyrs to the cause instead of saving them, not to mention how a 20-week ban would help chip away at Roe v. Wade.


12 posted on 01/12/2015 3:12:27 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

It doesn’t “chip away at Roe.” It actually reinforces the main lying premise of Roe, which is that the pre-born child is not a person.

Because, if it is a person - which any sane individual knows is the case - the Constitution absolutely requires equal protection.

Even the Roe judges admitted as much, in their infamous decision.


14 posted on 01/12/2015 3:32:51 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican
By all means, let’s keep abortion legal until the 38th week of gestation.

In fact, immoral, unconstitutional, lawless laws like this actually assure the continuation of abortion on demand. Why? Because they completely surrender the only two real moral, constitutional, and legal arguments against abortion, that being the God-given, inalienable, intrinsic nature of the individual right to life, and the absolute requirement that all persons be provided equal protection before the law, first and foremost in their supreme God-given right.

15 posted on 01/12/2015 3:37:55 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson