To: bestintxas
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels. 10% won’t generate enough revenue.
9 posted on
01/12/2015 6:12:41 AM PST by
Poser
(Cogito ergo Spam - I think, therefore I ham)
To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels. 10% wont generate enough revenue. Then the spending levels must be cut.
11 posted on
01/12/2015 6:15:46 AM PST by
ealgeone
To: Poser
It would on the corporate taxes. Many large corporations pay very little fed tax.
17 posted on
01/12/2015 6:21:58 AM PST by
Vermont Lt
(Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels. 10% wont generate enough revenue. You have it backwards. If the revenue is not "enough", then cut spending. Eliminate the entire welfare state, and 10% will be plenty to finance the government's legitimate functions as laid out in the Constitution.
26 posted on
01/12/2015 6:38:33 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: Poser
10% wont generate enough revenue.That's their problem. They should have to live on the income they have, like the rest of us. Cut out the waste and fraud.
69 posted on
01/12/2015 8:19:49 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels.You mean the spending levels that added 7.5 trillion to the deficit?
71 posted on
01/12/2015 8:30:51 AM PST by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson