Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9; Norm Lenhart
My criteria start with 'Can he beat Hillary?'" In other words, that's a deal breaker. It should be.

In other words, you are reacting defensively from the earliest stages. You are basing your choice on your expectations of the opposition. You allow yourself to be manipulated by how the left spins its way through a left-dominated media. HELLO???????

MY criteria start with: "Am I willing to be accountable for what happens if the guy I'm voting for wins?

THAT should be the "deal breaker." The identity of the opposition has zero relevance to what I am willing to vote FOR.

"Hillary" -- that's what worried Republicans were wailing in 2008, "anybody who can beat Hillary." Meanwhile, the Democrats nominated Obama right out from under their expectations.

You can vote "against" and "anybody-but" all you want. You're chasing unicorns when you do. Worse, it's "heads they win, tails we lose." It's a sucker's bet.

392 posted on 01/10/2015 10:06:34 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Finny; presidio9; Norm Lenhart
You can vote "against" and "anybody-but" all you want. You're chasing unicorns when you do. Worse, it's "heads they win, tails we lose." It's a sucker's bet.

Space Unicorns, even.

409 posted on 01/10/2015 11:05:45 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson