Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

No, that is not the case either. When an atheist, for example, reasons that there is no God because there is a natural way for the universe to form itself, that is use of reason, despite the error in the conclusion.


299 posted on 01/15/2015 7:06:00 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

Simply because Hawking is known to be highly intelligent doesn’t mean he’s right when he says the universe “can and will create itself,”

The statement is a good example of logical incoherence, or unreason. A thing cannot precede itself, therefore it cannot create itself.


300 posted on 01/15/2015 7:18:58 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson