Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator
[me:] So we should go back to having laws against blasphemy?

[you:] Yes. Next question?

The next question is who is going to write and enforce those blasphemy laws. Because, based on your other FR posts, many FReepers would consider, say, your views of Jesus of Nazareth to be blasphemous.

I am opposed to blasphemy laws not because I think nothing is blasphemous, but because I trust no government to draw those lines fairly.

193 posted on 01/08/2015 7:55:49 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian; Zionist Conspirator
your [Noahide] views of Jesus of Nazareth to be blasphemous.

Zionist Conspirator has irritated enough of me with his oddities, and I can say unequivocally: he is a thinking person who offers a coherent opinion about Christianity. That has nothing in common with a cartoon -- not even "speech", really, showing the Holy Trinity as a homosexual orgy, -- for example.

If someone thinks that angering a significant portion of the population without any redeeming intellectual value is in the society's interest, let him defend that "speech" in court. It should not be immune from prosecution on constitutional grounds.

203 posted on 01/08/2015 9:24:50 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson