Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘More will follow': ISIS fighter praises Paris massacre
New York Post ^ | January 7, 2015 | 1:28pm | No Attribution By Reuters

Posted on 01/07/2015 8:10:57 PM PST by MeshugeMikey

A fighter for the Islamic State militant group praised Wednesday’s attack on a French satirical magazine that killed at least 12 people, telling Reuters the raid was revenge for insults against Islam.

Hooded gunmen stormed the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo in the worst militant assault on French soil in recent decades. The dead included top editors at Charlie Hebdo, a publication renowned for lampooning Islam, as well as two police officers.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charliehebdo; france; francemagazine; isis; islam; terrorattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Democrat_media

Truther: Don’t believe your lying eyes, that was not a plane, that was a controlled demolition.


21 posted on 01/07/2015 9:56:37 PM PST by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bluejean
It is way past time to start seriously kicking butt.

It sure won't happen on the Obamanation's watch. We'll just have to wait to see what Hildebeest will do.

22 posted on 01/07/2015 9:58:17 PM PST by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

THIS APPROACH WORKED AGAINST THE MORMONS AND WOULD WORK AGAINST THE MOSLUMS.........

the Edmunds–Tucker Act of 1887 touched all the issues at dispute between the United States Congress and the LDS Church. The act disincorporated both the church and its Perpetual Emigration Fund on the grounds that they fostered polygamy. The act prohibited the practice of polygamy and punished it with a fine of from $500 to $800 and imprisonment of up to five years. It dissolved the corporation of the church and directed the confiscation by the federal government of all church properties valued over a limit of $50,000.

In July of the same year, the U.S. Attorney General filed suit to seize the church and all of its assets. The act was enforced by the U.S. marshal and a host of deputies. The act:
Dissolved the LDS Church and the Perpetual Emigrating Fund Company, with assets to be used for public schools in the territory.[9]
Required an anti-polygamy oath for prospective voters, jurors and public officials.
Annulled territorial laws allowing illegitimate children to inherit.
Required civil marriage licenses (to aid in the prosecution of polygamy).
Abrogated the common law spousal privilege to require wives to testify against their husbands[10]
Disfranchised women (who had been enfranchised by the territorial legislature in 1870).
Replaced local judges (including the previously powerful Probate Court judges) with federally appointed judges.
Removed local control in school textbook choice.[citation needed]

In 1890, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the seizure of church property under the Edmunds–Tucker Act in Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States.

The church was losing control of the territorial government, and many members and leaders were being actively pursued as fugitives. Without being able to appear publicly, in the 1880s the leadership was left to navigate “underground”.

Following the Edmunds-Tucker Act, the LDS Church found it difficult to operate as a viable institution.

Just do this against the Moslems in this country. Enough is enough.


23 posted on 01/07/2015 9:59:25 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Ha! If the Hildebeast is next, we’re toast. Ben Ghazi. ‘Nuff said.


24 posted on 01/07/2015 10:01:55 PM PST by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
 
 
The historical record is true on that - the veneer of civilization is actually thinner with them than most would realize. Europeans can go from "please don't hurt us, we'll pay you not to hurt us" to !EVERYBODY DIES! when the circumstances come together. I see posts around the internet that like to proclaim how Europe is full of poltroons and poofters and how they aren't going to do anything. Well, the place has always had poltroons and poofters - that's not anything new. But they can - and have - go schizo in ways that are deadly and horrific. History is littered with the examples.
 
 

25 posted on 01/07/2015 11:16:39 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

“I’m sure they intend to perform more senseless, hate-driven, sadistic murder against those who resist Islamic tyranny.”..

Then you are suggesting with odumbo at the helm, we don’t have to worry about such an attack here in the U.S.? We all know odumbo supports the muzzies, guess we are good to go then........


26 posted on 01/08/2015 4:22:02 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

from your lips to God’s Ear!


27 posted on 01/08/2015 7:39:15 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Yes.... being unarmed has a few drawbacks...


28 posted on 01/08/2015 7:40:15 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I sense that a corner may have been reached....


29 posted on 01/08/2015 7:41:26 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

yes step one...would have to be arming the thin blue line.

step two allowing the “populace” to arm itself.

I sense that this would pretty much eliminate the need for an immediate step three...or four


30 posted on 01/08/2015 7:45:20 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

t shirts...and sweat shirts bearing the cartoon.....would be an obvious choice here.


31 posted on 01/08/2015 7:47:32 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DanielRedfoot

Joe Bob Reuters? Mary Sue Reuters...perhaps?..../s


32 posted on 01/08/2015 7:50:07 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aquila48



33 posted on 01/08/2015 8:17:45 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson