Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
When we have an important industry being jerked around by foreign powers, IMHO the minimum “interference” our government should impose would be to put a thumb on the scale in favor of local fuel production. Energy independence is within our grasp. But maybe we don’t really want it after all, and are willing to be hostage to hostiles?

Impose a modest tariff now, while the price of crude is in flux, and lower than we have been accustomed to. Then when the Saudis want to put the screws to our industry, they will have just a little more headwind. Put whatever revenue you get from the tariff into subsidizing domestic use, to answer your objection about damage to petroleum processors and users. That would be fine.

Whatever you do along those lines creates distortions, I fully get that. But the “system” we have now needs to be stabilized, in a way that favors security.

23 posted on 01/07/2015 8:09:02 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

No government selection of winners and loser in private industry.

Why do you want to make our refineries and petrochemical industries less competitive with other nations?

Your suggestion will make it cheaper to shut down a refinery, lose the jobs, and just import gasoline rather than the whole barrel.

Quit looking to government to help private industry. We do just fine without their “help”. Take Reagan’s viewpoint in this.


24 posted on 01/08/2015 4:58:31 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson