Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On gay marriage, Jeb Bush ready to move on
Miami Herald ^ | 1/5/15 | Marc Caputo

Posted on 01/06/2015 3:27:30 PM PST by BlatherNaut

While opponents of same-sex marriage are vowing to fight on, former Gov. Jeb Bush sounds ready to move on as he considers a potential bid for president.

“We live in a democracy, and regardless of our disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law,” Bush said in a statement Monday. “I hope that we can also show respect for the good people on all sides of the gay and lesbian marriage issue — including couples making lifetime commitments to each other who are seeking greater legal protections and those of us who believe marriage is a sacrament and want to safeguard religious liberty.”

(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; heirtothethrone; homosexualagenda; jebbush; jebbush2016; terrischaivo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: BlatherNaut

Has Boehner endorsed Jebbie yet, or is that being saved for the climax?


21 posted on 01/06/2015 3:53:35 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Guesser

They surely will vote Bush in TX, did so on Nov. 4, 2014, for that matter.


22 posted on 01/06/2015 3:54:37 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

The country is finished. F u jeb


23 posted on 01/06/2015 3:56:26 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Leftists do not respect the “rule of law”. If the SCOTUS rules against them

Obeying SCOTUS when they are wrong is NOT the "rule of law".

24 posted on 01/06/2015 3:59:46 PM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: greene66

There seems to be more and more of us getting the message, isn’t there?


25 posted on 01/06/2015 4:01:40 PM PST by amnestynone (A big government conservative is just a corporatist who is not paying enough taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
regardless of our disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law

We'd love to. But we have rogue judges, militant gays venue shopping and jumped-up local officials violating the will of the people as expressed time and again.

In addition, does this respect for the rule of law extend to our borders? Our welfare system vis-a-vis eligibility?

Isn't it interesting that unilateral abandonment of principles is described as 'moving on' or 'getting it off the table?' If we follow this policy to its logical conclusion what, exactly, will Jeb Bush and/or the GOP actually stand for?

26 posted on 01/06/2015 4:02:08 PM PST by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Breto
Jebs now another of the official spokes faces.....




27 posted on 01/06/2015 4:13:04 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: relictele
Isn't it interesting that unilateral abandonment of principles is described as 'moving on' or 'getting it off the table?'

Well put.

If we follow this policy to its logical conclusion what, exactly, will Jeb Bush and/or the GOP actually stand for?

The New World Order.

28 posted on 01/06/2015 4:13:17 PM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

Because we have allowed government to define “marriage” for its own purposes (such as taxation and regulation of estates), we have allowed government to define marriage as a social institution. That was fine as long as people in control of government were generally supportive of God’s original definition of marriage. However we have entered a time when a growing number of people in control of government want to redefine marriage for their own purposes, which in part is contrary to God’s definition.

Marriage is now far more a matter of politics and ideology than of private religious beliefs.

Therefore, for the sake of marriage as God defines it, it is time to remove from government the power to define who is married and who is not. Then people could form whatever relationships they please but they could not force those who disagree to be enablers for those relationships. And we would not have schools that must teach that homosexual “marriages” are just as legitimate as heterosexual ones. Nor would we have owners of wedding-related services being threatened with arrest and being convicted of a crime for merely declining to artfully photograph a “marriage” they find morally repugnant.


29 posted on 01/06/2015 4:13:43 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
Then people could form whatever relationships they please but they could not force those who disagree to be enablers for those relationships.

Marxism and "force" are inseparable.

30 posted on 01/06/2015 4:16:07 PM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
I have two words for that SOB.

Terry Schiavo.

Now, people, now that the GOP has finally openly declared war on Conservatives, do you really want the guy running the show and picking the death panels to be the one who would starve and dehydrate a helpless woman to death?

He could have stopped it.

If what was done to that lady had been done to an axe murderer there would have been an incredible outcry over 'cruel and unusual punishment'.

What was her crime?

Not only NO, Jeb, but HELL NO!

31 posted on 01/06/2015 4:21:01 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

bump

too bad the guys who are supposedly on “our side” don’t get that


32 posted on 01/06/2015 4:32:49 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
“We live in a democracy, and regardless of our disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law whims of morally bankrupt politicians, judges, and their media cheerleaders,” Bush said in a statement Monday.
33 posted on 01/06/2015 4:39:45 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

That’s the story of the Bush family. The Dems grab power and enact Socialist programs. The Bushes shrug and say we have to accept it. No More Bushes. Ever.


34 posted on 01/06/2015 4:42:43 PM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amnestynone
This crap is just exactly why I am ready and willing to raise taxes on the wealthy country club GOP establishment as well as the liberal gentrys that run the Dem party.

Taxes are for the little people.
35 posted on 01/06/2015 4:51:49 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

“We live in a democracy, and regardless of our disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law,” Bush said in a statement Monday.

Our form of government is a Constitutional Republic. I am sick of these people saying it is a democracy.


36 posted on 01/06/2015 4:53:05 PM PST by hwkbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
we have to respect the rule of law

Law? This is a sick joke foisted on the country by dissolute elitist judges who make up public policy at cocktail parties and bathhouses.

37 posted on 01/06/2015 4:55:38 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut; GeronL
“We live in a democracy, and regardless of our disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law,” Bush said

Will of the people to democratically establish the law be damned. Gay gods in black dresses will determine "the rule of law" by judicial edict, dontchaknow.

Florida had a constitutional amendment that was set by the voters there and thrown out because a judge said that it was against the US Constitution. Nothing in the US constitution about marriage or homosexuals. Gods in black dresses made it up. That isn't democracy or the rule of law. It is judicial tyranny. B'uh bye, Jeb.

38 posted on 01/06/2015 5:09:20 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

bump


39 posted on 01/06/2015 5:14:34 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

On Jeb Bush, America is ready to move on.


40 posted on 01/06/2015 5:19:28 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson