the lengths that you are having to go to try to elicit a positive comment about the squirelly little guy is quite instructive.
No, it was part of a two-part question*; that you are unwilling to say yea or nay is quite interesting.
* The other part was that, since Romney is [politically] Obama's clone (there's no major policy-area where they are different) your allegation may have made no sense.
(i.e. you might essentially be saying A ≥ B ≥ C but not A ≥ C which indicates a problem somewhere.)