Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark
And often exaggerated too - although he certainly isn't as pure as the driven snow and I would not be at all surprised to hear of relationships with women. But there's a big difference between that and sex parties - I would find that surprising, but not astonishing. And I would find it absolutely astonishing if he'd done anything close to illegal. For a start, he's accompanied by a police officer virtually everywhere he goes and while they would turn a blind eye to 'innocent' activities, I would certainly not expect their discretion to extend to anything like this. And there are other people around him to 'protect him from himself' if he even came close to do something this scandalous. I'd have done it myself in certain situations (I never had to, but there are expectations placed on their friends and colleagues). I can't know for certain. I've never been involved in a situation where it actually came up - but it really would astonish me.

It's not just a matter of it being at odds with the behaviour I'd expect of the man - although it is to some extent. It's the other factors involved.

I also wouldn't be expecting the Palace to be so strident in their denials unless they truly knew there wasn't a case. They are going much further than they need to - and their job above all else is to protect the Queen. Her Majesty might not throw her son to the wolves (although if he actually did something like this, I wouldn't honestly put it past her) but the courtiers certainly would if they thought it was needed.

13 posted on 01/04/2015 2:03:38 AM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

That was said about Harry as well. Yet he was photographed naked with a naked young woman using him as a shield in Las Vegas.

At the time there was talk about ,”where were his minders?”


14 posted on 01/04/2015 2:15:19 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

you are frightfully naive.


33 posted on 01/04/2015 8:28:11 AM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

“I also wouldn’t be expecting the Palace to be so strident in their denials unless they truly knew there wasn’t a case.”

Don’t know anything about this case, but when I read your comment I thought of Clinton’s very public denial of Monica..


51 posted on 01/04/2015 6:41:16 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson