I don’t have a problem for the most part with that take on it, unless you’re so inherently fearful of dogs you can’t tell the difference from one that is a slathering hell hound and one that’s friendly. One would need to be prepared to take the consequences of shooting someones dog on a whim that wasn’t an immediate threat.
FYI, I don’t have a dog now, and haven’t ever had one of these breeds. My rhetoric is on behalf of freedom and personal responsibility on this issue.
I also agree with most of his post but his description of "genetically rabid dogs" is worrisome
and reflects poorly on his ability to think and act rationally in this matter.
There are two meanings to 'rabid'.
One is, being infected with the disease of rabies.
To claim a dog or set of dogs is 'genetically rabid' is obviously absurd
and points to the poster as exhibiting the other defintion of 'rabid', that is,
"having or proceeding from an extreme or fanatical support of or belief in something".
My rhetoric is on behalf of freedom and personal responsibility on this issue.
Brother