[zipper]

That is eerily similar to what liberals do when they oppose gun ownership.

You abandoned the direct comparison of vicious dog ownership with gun ownership, and now your associations have gone from direct comparisons to "eerily similar".

More evidence you lost the argument.

[kanawa]

You don't get it.
|
In the first place he is not talking about ‘vicious” dog ownership.

There are two comparisons being made...

The first comparison involves the principle of personal responsibility
being applicable to owning either a dog or a gun.

The second comparison is between the irrational responses liberals have towards guns
and the irrational liberal-like responses some that like to think themselves ‘conservative’
have when it comes to dogs.

You are putting words in his mouth and based on your concoction concluding he has lost the argument. /smh