Actually, you won't accept responsibility for anyone's reasonable assurance of non-aggression from you. You think you can opt out of the social contract to which every societal member belongs.
If my dog is no threat to you or your family, leave me and my dog out of the equation.
Happily! Feel free to move to an island with nobody but you and your vicious urban thug accessory animal.
If I or my guns are of no threat to you or your family, leave me out of the equation.
Which one of your guns runs out the door when you open it? Which one do you have penned up in your back yard? Which one has free will?
It's a simple concept, really. But one that the left fails to fully understand.
"Equation" implies balance. There appears to be an 'imbalance' between vicious chihuahua maulings and pit bull maulings. The courts and local law enforcement are empowered by the citizenry to address rogue animal ownership and custodianship, even if it means legal sanction, within the boundaries of local and state law (it's not a Constitutional issue, as with gun ownership -- not that the analogy has specific validity anyway, as I keep having to point out).
It's right next to the one that states you can take someone's family pet because you have an irrational and unwarranted fear of it.
The courts and local law enforcement are empowered by the citizenry to address rogue animal ownership and custodianship,
Interesting that you should bring up "the courts"...
Clay's vicious dog ordinance is unconstitutional, judge rules
Happily! Feel free to move to an island with nobody but you and your vicious urban thug accessory animal.
I am happy where I am, thank you. You should feel free to move to the island of your choosing where you will be free of your irrational and unwarranted fear of family pets.
Which one of your guns runs out the door when you open it? Which one do you have penned up in your back yard? Which one has free will?
Have you seen my dog do that? No you haven't. Nor do you have any real experience with the dogs of millions of Americans. You are basing your failed argument on hysteria. That is eerily similar to what liberals do when they oppose gun ownership. And while I do find that mildly amusing, it hardly warrants my Sunday afternoon. You will never convince me to join your hysterical opposition to family pets and I can see I will never convince you that your hysteria is unwarranted. So be it. Bye.
Do you have any idea how many people are killed by horses and cattle each year?
Where’s the outrage?