Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PJ-Comix
Well, the senate as intended would have the senators appointed by the governors of their respective states to represent the state's interest in dc.

I think it would have been better if it had remained that way.

4 posted on 01/03/2015 3:12:11 PM PST by correctthought ("Obamunism is a temporary setback on the road to freedom" - Liberty Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: correctthought
the senate as intended would have the senators appointed by the governors of their respective states

Nope, elected by the legislatures.

Which meant campaigns for the legislature often were dominated by who would be elected to the Senate. That's what the Lincoln/Douglas debates were about, elections to the IL legislature.

8 posted on 01/03/2015 3:15:46 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: correctthought
Well, the senate as intended would have the senators appointed by the governors of their respective states to represent the state's interest in dc.

Or selected by the state Legislatures.

14 posted on 01/03/2015 3:25:56 PM PST by PJ-Comix (Coakley/Gruber 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: correctthought; PJ-Comix
Well, the senate as intended would have the senators appointed by the governors of their respective states to represent the state's interest in dc.

Elected by the state legislatures not appointed by the state governor. The only time a governor appoints a senator is in the case that a senate seat is vacant.

41 posted on 01/03/2015 5:11:07 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson