Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

I’ve come to the opinion that Monty’s failure to clear the Scheldt Estuary in September led directly to the Ardennes Offensive in December. Without the logistic limitations, the Americans would have deployed more divisions earlier, and sufficiently supplied, the “big push” in November at Metz and Aachen would have happened in October. Hitler would not have been able to hold the front west of the Rhine with his thin screen of units. The strategic reserve would have been forced from his hand before it was even fully assembled.


30 posted on 12/28/2014 7:50:49 PM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: henkster
Your argument makes perfect sense, although it leads me to wonder, given the German penchant for counterattacks, whether the Germans wouldn't have found a strong counterattack, smaller perhaps than their Ardennes effort, to the October push you describe. In other words, wasn't some counterattack inevitable?
31 posted on 12/28/2014 8:00:58 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: henkster; abb; Hebrews 11:6; occamrzr06
I agree with your analysis. Taking the Scheldt early would have changed the course of the war.

Unfortunately, as today's posts imply, Ike could not have forced that without firing Monty, which was politically impossible. The man seems to be living on another planet.

36 posted on 12/29/2014 10:53:25 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson