Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant

Well, possibly.

But she interprets failed president in the ordinary sense...did he do whats good for the Americans and their country?

We all know the answer to that.


11 posted on 12/23/2014 11:35:49 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator
He passed his policies, he passed his budgets, he gets the Republicans to do whatever he wants, he gets to do what they won't agree to with executive orders and they don't try to stop him. He may be the most successful President ever.

Success is always going to be defined by whether the President got accomplished what he set out to do, not by how well the American people are living. Lenin was successful. Castro was successful. Mao was successful. But their people suffered. Reagan was only partially successful. He had to constantly fight a Democrat House, and was able to slow the growth of big government, but not set it on a path of reduction. He couldn't even get rid of the Department of Education, a little tiny brand new agency, and now look at what Obama can do with it to our nation's kids.

Reagan was successful. Obama has been more successful.

33 posted on 12/24/2014 8:37:30 AM PST by Defiant (How does a President reverse the actions of a dictator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson