Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2014 7:58:21 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

P!


2 posted on 12/22/2014 7:59:08 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Uh-oh.

Someone’s riling Gog.


3 posted on 12/22/2014 8:04:50 PM PST by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Perhaps the Saudis have *two* goals...to shut down our fracking *and* to bring Putin to his knees.
4 posted on 12/22/2014 8:05:58 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Jimmy Carter;No Longer The Worst President In My Lifetime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The Saudis are about the most vile people on the planet. The only thing saving their vile azzes is us. If not for us protecting them, they would have long been overthrown.

It’s always important to remember that 15 of the 19 came from Saudi Arabia.


6 posted on 12/22/2014 8:08:06 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

All those Saudi Princes allowances can be a drain


7 posted on 12/22/2014 8:08:44 PM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Those greedheaded Islamo Saudi slimeballs shouldn’t tease the bear.

Russia may be a shadow of its former self but they could still waltz into Saudi Arabia and set up shop without breaking into a sweat.


11 posted on 12/22/2014 8:23:25 PM PST by Iron Munro (D.H.S. has the same headcount as the US Marine Corps with twice the budget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Silly Arab!

When the Arabs cause the Russians sufficient financial pain, and pose a sufficiently great threat to the Russian economy, the Russians may well nuke the Arab oil fields.

That would make their oil more valuable, and as only Muslims would be killed, most of the world would want to buy the Russians a round of drinks for their successful ‘direct reduction’ of the Muslim population.

“Never pull the bear’s tail” goes the folklore line.

Never pick the bear’s pocket, either.

;-)


12 posted on 12/22/2014 8:26:28 PM PST by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est. Because of what Islam is - and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Gazprom is one of the most corrupt and inefficient companies on the planet! It is no wonder that their whole system collapses almost right away.


13 posted on 12/22/2014 8:26:42 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Naimi is likely to find that the Iranians have an ally with deep military resources, who disagrees with the new Saudi perspective.


14 posted on 12/22/2014 8:27:28 PM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

that must have hurt puttie putte’s putte.


18 posted on 12/22/2014 8:36:56 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Very stupid to poke the Russian bear when your own society needs other armies to defend it and is sitting on a powder keg.


19 posted on 12/22/2014 8:37:14 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The Saudis don’t care?

What happens when they can’t make welfare payments to the majority of their population that don’t work?


23 posted on 12/22/2014 8:58:44 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wow! The Saudi arrogance is stunning. There are so many ways for Russia to break the Saudis; hacker attacks, financial attacks, bombing, invasion by a proxy state. We live in interesting times.


24 posted on 12/22/2014 9:22:26 PM PST by WMarshal (Free citizen, never a subject or a civilian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
After being in the oil business 35 years, I can pretty safely say that the Saudi's intent is two fold. (1) Primarily attack Russia, for its geopolitical actions, while (2) Throw a dagger into US production.

Using (1) to result in (2) is a lot more politically correct, and will be excused as an unintended consequence.

The US / Canada Hydrocarbon Production resurgence is looked at as the biggest threat to OPEC's grip on global markets.

32 posted on 12/22/2014 9:45:30 PM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

whats not being said here, is that in Brazil,
going online very soon,
is a plant that produces fuel ethanol
from sugarcane bagasse.

if it works out this time,
all bets are off


33 posted on 12/22/2014 9:56:49 PM PST by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; gandalftb; SunkenCiv; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; Cap Huff; ...

This is the important part:

The problem with old fields around the world is that they need continuous investment in new wells, and they cannot shut old wells, because if they do, they will not come back up. So they are wary in that respect, particularly in West Siberia, where they have been producing for a long time and the wells there are declining.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/saudi-oil-minister-hints-russia-doesnt-deserve-market-share-2014-12

and this is the reason why the shale oil producers are immune:

In the full development phase, it may take as little as a few months from a capital investment decision to first production. Moreover, due to steep initial production declines, a new well often has full payback in one to three years.

Compare this to ultra-deepwater or international mega-projects that can consume five to ten years (or even longer) and many billions of dollars in development capex before first oil. Add to that the risk and cost of political instability, expropriation and corruption that are sometimes associated with non-OECD jurisdictions, or environmental and operating risk in ultradeepwater or harsh environments, and the cost-of-capital comparison is clearly in favor of simple, predictable and politically riskless shale plays.

As a result, shale oil operators can respond to a price signal with a production increase much faster than most of their non-shale competitors and are likely to gain market share in the upcycle, effectively at the expense of mega-projects that have much longer lead times.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2780895-is-saudi-arabia-targeting-u-s-shales?ifp=0

2015 will be fine. The only risk is if Putin goes crazy and start something to disrupt the flow of oil from the ME. http://20committee.com/2014/12/23/beware-putins-special-war-in-2015/


42 posted on 12/26/2014 7:29:10 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson