Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: occamrzr06

In all my reading I mainly saw the heroic sacrifice and recovery of the American forces. A German vs. American duel to the death.

Don’t remember much direct British involvement, other than Montgomery moving in units to secure the Meuse bridges to the rear, at least until very late in the day.

Or maybe I just haven’t read widely enough on the subject. It was a huge, complex set of events.

I wonder how much actual combat British forces participated in while the outcome in the Ardennes hung in the balance.


43 posted on 12/21/2014 5:11:28 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

Well, Monty was in charge, so there’s that. Also from my post yesterday:

“British stocks would help make good American losses, including 100 25-pounder guns with 300,000 rounds of ammunition; 20,000 snow suits; 2,000 trip flares; and 350 Sherman tanks with duck-bill cleats affixed for better traction.”

Monty also moved his XXX Corps south in order to give the Ninth Army the ability to attack the flank of the German offensive.


45 posted on 12/21/2014 5:24:56 PM PST by occamrzr06 (A great life is but a series of dogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson