And look at the link in post 23 for your answer. Does that disagree with “every report you’ve found”?
> “Nope. It gives no basis to the claim $20 for a decade. No support at all for the numbers you made up.”
The link shows clearly that the Saudis are afraid of US Oil Production which demolishes the garbage article you posted.
As far as the number “20”, you’re splitting hairs trying to make a frivolous point. The number could be 30, 25, 20, 19, 23, 31 etc. But of course your schtik is to divert attention to frivolous matters when you’ve called on the carpet about much bigger matters.
Now read it again and compare it with your Rippelmeyer garbage:
Or $80 or $100. You claim has no basis. You made it, can you not support it?
Now read it again
I read it a second time. Not surprising, the words and information did not change.
Why don't you cite the words in the article that you think support the claim of $20 for a decade? Or what ever number you now want to claim.