Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
But funding the development of nuclear weapons, or power, is a military/political decision only slightly affected by economics.

I disagree, when revenues are half of what are needed. It is a time of desperation for nations like Iran and Venezuela, because their spending has been really out of control.

If in their interests, another country can just give it to them for nothing even .

I believe Russia had that attitude, before they got in such financial problems themselves. Which other nuclear power do you think would fund that today?

17 posted on 12/19/2014 11:56:02 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Nuclear weapons development requires a lot of funding but their possession doesn’t. There were nuclear weapons in Cuba at one time.
I don’t think any nation would give them the technology at this time but ‘things change’. If N Korea could do it secretly and also very profitably they probably would. The ‘secretly’ part is the hard part...

Looking for reasons SA doesn’t cut production is starting to appear facetious (silly, futile, beside-the-point) to me.


20 posted on 12/19/2014 12:09:22 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson