[JennysCool]

Camille did make a VERY valid point in the article, though, whether it's Cosby, Duke lacrosse, UVA, or those cases where someone "finds" a racist threat directed at them: "There appears to be no vetting of my husband's accusers before stories are published or aired," she said. "An accusation is published, and immediately goes viral ... None of us will ever want to be in the position of attacking a victim. But the question should be asked - who is the victim?"

Trial by Dr. Phil is no way to run a society.

[BunnySlippers]

How do you vet them?

Rolling Stone did a terrible job ... But how do you vet without weeding people out?

[mylife]

Amen.

[ansel12]

You forget that he has already settled out of court with one of his victims, in 2006, after he drugged and raped her in 2004, and she brought forth 13 more such victims.

These women come from different cities, different states, different decades, and most are in their 50s 60s and 70s some of them the 13 Jane does of years ago, who remained Jane does until this dam broke.

This didn’t just suddenly appear out of nowhere with a couple of flaky chicks seeking publicity.