So-called legal entrapment only occurs where one induces another to commit a crime that one would not have normally committed. Merely leaving a garage door open cannot be considered this; Kaarma would have somehow forced Dede to have entered his garage, which he did not.
Liberals even consider bait cars entrapment.
The jury was wrong.
Read “Kaarma would have somehow had to have forced Dede to enter his garage”, i.e. to really have been entrapment.
No, not in this case because he intentionally left it open to draw in the culprits and waited with a loaded shotgun.
That makes all the difference whether you want to believe it or not! As law abiding and pro home defense as I am, I could never abide by someone who planned and executed this premeditated act! There are lawful qualifications - premeditation is a major one!