[Bubba Ho-Tep]

So you’re actually claiming that Kaarma would have shot a “small child” because he just wanted to trap any human being to shoot rather than stop (a) criminal(s) who had been burglarizing him?

Given that Kaarma told police that he shot blindly into the darkness and never saw the person in his garage until he'd killed him, yeah, it could have been anyone, including a kid.

[Olog-hai]

A little kid would enter Kaarma’s garage at 12:30 in the morning? Absurd.

Besides, that is not what the prosecutor or witnesses (witnesses?) said.

In their rebuttal, prosecutors called Kaarma the aggressor and told the jury it is “sickening” that he adjusted his aim for the final gunshot. Witnesses testified Kaarma fired three times at roughly the same level, but readjusted and raised his aim for the shot that killed Dede. …

Seems to me that whatever witnesses there were are biased witnesses, not to mention accessories to Dede’s attempt at burglary.

It also looks like the hairdresser’s testimony was not corroborated.