I guess a thief who robs a store and fights with a cop should be allowed to just get away (while telling the cop he is too much of a p.... to shoot him)?
May I assume you live nowhere near any “Michael Browns”?
The witnesses alone cleared the cop; do you find fault with their testimony?
Is everybody on this thread reading comprehension challenged?
All I said is that statements that Wilson “had no choice” but to shoot Brown are quite simply untrue.
He had a whole bunch of choices. Quite possibly he made the right one. As I specifically said, I’m not saying he made the wrong choice, only that he DID have other options.
We will never know whether both Brown and Wilson would have survived had he made one of those other choices. Perhaps today Wilson would be dead and Brown in prison on a capital murder charge. And nobody would have heard of either, outside of St. Louis.