Replies

In 1954 it was not abnormal to marry a 14 or 15 year old.
All that stuff is relative.

In this case, Where is the PROOF?

The statute of limitation for rape has passed for the women Cosby raped...so no proof needed. The woman only have this time to speak their mind, for no other compensation will probably be theirs.

IF they were married to Cosby and the State law allowed it, of course, it would not have been rape...however, that wasn't the case. In criminal activity, the situation as it applies to the law is the basis for a crime or not. ----------------------------------- Article quote... you said was about touching...read these two paragraphs... § 14‑27.7A. Statutory rape or sexual offense of person who is 13, 14, or 15 years old. (a) A defendant is guilty of a Class B1 felony if the defendant engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with another person who is 13, 14, or 15 years old and the defendant is at least six years older than the person, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the person. (b) A defendant is guilty of a Class C felony if the defendant engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with another person who is 13, 14, or 15 years old and the defendant is more than four but less than six years older than the person, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the person. (1995, c. 281, s. 1.) What do I consider sex? What 99% of the nation would agree is sex: AS for your comment on the article I gave you, which quoted the law: What part of the 'vaginal intercourse' did you not understand? Why would you defend a man who has dozens of accusers, who were obviously traumatized....and at the time he was so powerful in Hollywood, no one would have allowed them to suggest he was a 'serial rapist'; which in my mind is what he is based on the details involved.