Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Federal judge finds Obama amnesty is unconstitutional
The Washington Times ^
| December 16, 2014
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 12/16/2014 11:38:02 AM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: jazusamo
Screw you GOPe for not voting with Ted Cruz. Idiots!!
21
posted on
12/16/2014 11:49:44 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: jazusamo
YES! , now jail the socialist marxist would be dictator Obama for these high crimes that violated our Constitution which he cannot do
22
posted on
12/16/2014 11:49:48 AM PST
by
Democrat_media
(The media is the problem. reporters are just democrat political activists posing as reporters)
To: MaxMax
The GOP House leadership will DOUBLE DOWN and try to squelch this story and this decision. They want total amnesty.
23
posted on
12/16/2014 11:50:04 AM PST
by
navyguy
(The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
To: jazusamo
” and Judge Schwabs order does not invalidate the presidents policies”
—
For heaven’s sake,why?
.
24
posted on
12/16/2014 11:50:28 AM PST
by
Mears
To: ground_fog; All
True..Washington Establishment Party, votes constantly to screw the American Taxpayers.
25
posted on
12/16/2014 11:51:53 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
To: jazusamo
Check the brakes on the way home.
26
posted on
12/16/2014 11:52:04 AM PST
by
ealgeone
To: jazusamo
Meaningless.
Even if SCOTUS throws it out, he’ll do it anyway
27
posted on
12/16/2014 11:52:22 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Jim Robinson
28
posted on
12/16/2014 11:52:52 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin)
To: jazusamo
Federal judge finds Obama amnesty is unconstitutional So what. One can just as easily find another judge who'll be carrying the Left's and Bath House's water on this issue. What "the law" means anymore is nothing but a judicial lottery by black robed idiots with big egos.
29
posted on
12/16/2014 11:54:53 AM PST
by
bkopto
(Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
To: spokeshave
Isn’t that John Boehner’s truck?
30
posted on
12/16/2014 11:56:14 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: All
But it serves as a warning shot
Since when does anybody up there care about a warning shot? I'd doubt that a complete overturn by SCOTUS would even be effective at this point.
To: jazusamo
And on appeal, the next judge will say it’s Constitutional, and then the next will shoot it down, and finally it’ll wend its way to SCOTUS, where the namby pamby, so-called “Conservative” judges will find a reason that it’s Constitutional, and all will be well in Obolaland. And us “patriots”? Well, we’ll keep on doing what we do best: Piss and moan, and then go to work so we can pay the bills.
32
posted on
12/16/2014 11:58:21 AM PST
by
dware
("White Privilege" stems from one's ability to lace up work boots and read a work schedule)
To: jazusamo
33
posted on
12/16/2014 11:58:50 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: GeronL
Even if SCOTUS throws it out, hell do it anyway Exactly right. What's congress gonna do anyway? Impeach? No way. Not a black man - nation-wide Ferguson riots would result. Besides, congress is made of cowards, naves, thieves and traitors, anyway.
34
posted on
12/16/2014 11:59:25 AM PST
by
bkopto
(Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
To: jazusamo
It’ll be overturned on appeal.
That said, Obama’s not going to back down.
35
posted on
12/16/2014 11:59:40 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: Jim Robinson
For sure Jim. We’ll purge them next.
36
posted on
12/16/2014 11:59:48 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: jazusamo
LOL, Throw some of that unconstitutional back at Obama , ROFL
37
posted on
12/16/2014 12:00:33 PM PST
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: GeronL
Even if the SC throws it out, he'll do it anywayThat's what I'm wondering. What's to stop Obama from spending the next two years in Hawaii, passing executive orders and doing what he damn well pleases? Boehner and McConnell?
It's up to the conservatives in the HOR to get Boehner out of his position.
38
posted on
12/16/2014 12:01:24 PM PST
by
grania
To: jazusamo
The judge must be wrong, Congress just agreed to fund the program, so they must agree with it. Count on an Appeals Court deciding
exactly that. Since Congress had an opportunity to NOT fund the implementation, they approved of it implicitly, by enabling the money to be spent.
This deal is done.
39
posted on
12/16/2014 12:05:13 PM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: Sgt_Schultze
There is no Executive Order, if I understand it correctly. That, in and of itself is a problem for Obama because not only is he implementing something not authorized by the Constitution, there is no executive order for it either. There is NO authorization for it, whatsoever, except for the fact it has been funded.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson